Justis v. Pszcolkowski
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; denying petitioner's 2 Motion for a stay and abeyance; directing that this action is dismissed from the docket of the court. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/16/2016. (cc: petitioner; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON
RAY JUSTIS,
Petitioner,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:16-05199
KAREN PSZCZOLKOWSKI, Warden,
Northern Correctional Facility,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The court having received the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert,
filed on October 31, 2016, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B); and having reviewed the record in this proceeding;
and there being no objections filed by any party to the proposed
findings and recommendation; and it appearing proper so to do, it
is ORDERED that the findings and conclusions made in the proposed
findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they
hereby are, adopted by the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion for
a stay and abeyance be, and it hereby is, denied.
It is further
ORDERED that this action be, and it hereby is, dismissed from the
docket of the court.
Byrd United States Courthouse in Charleston, before
the undersigned, unless canceled. Lead counsel
directed to appear.
02/29/2016
Entry of scheduling order.
The Clerk day directed to forward P 26(a)(1) this written
03/08/2016
Last is to serve F.R. Civ. copies of disclosures.
opinion and order to plaintiff, all counsel of record and the United
The Clerk is requested to transmit this Order and
States Magistrate Judge. record and to any unrepresented
Notice to all counsel of
parties.
DATED: December 16, 2016
DATED: January 5, 2016
John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?