Fitzwater et al v. CONSOL Energy, Inc. et al

Filing 200

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 104 MOTION to Amend the Complaint of Emmett Casey, Jr.; granting Plaintiffs' 154 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying defendants' 158 MOTION to Strike and MOTION t o Exclude Testimony; granting defendants' 159 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting defendants' 161 MOTION to Correct; granting Plaintiff's 165 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response in Opposition. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 9/30/2019. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON BENNY FITZWATER and CLARENCE BRIGHT, and TERRY PRATER, and EMMET CASEY, JR., and CONNIE Z. GILBERT, and ALLAN H. JACK, SR., and ROBERT H. LONG, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-09849 CONSOL ENERGY, INC., and Consolidated with: CONSOLIDATION COAL CO., and Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-03861 FOLA COAL CO., LLC, and CONSOL OF KENTUCKY, INC., and CONSOL BUCHANAN MINING CO., LLC, and CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO., LLC, and KURT SALVATORI, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending are (1) the plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint of Emmett Casey, Jr., et al., filed March 1, 2018, (2) the plaintiffs’ motion to exceed page limitation, filed August 17, 2018, (3) the plaintiffs’ motion to extend time, filed September 20, 2018, (4) the defendants’ motion to strike and to exclude testimony of Dean Michael Hymes (“Hymes”), filed August 24, 2018, (5) the defendants’ motion to exceed page limitation, filed August 31, 2018, and (6) the defendants’ motion to correct their response opposing the plaintiffs’ supplemental motion for class certification, filed September 6, 2018. First, the plaintiffs met the March 1, 2018 deadline set forth in the February 6, 2018 scheduling order to amend the pleadings. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint be, and it hereby is, granted. As to the second, third, and fifth motions, it is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ and the defendants’ respective motions to exceed page limitations and the plaintiffs’ motion to extend time be, and hereby are, granted. In the October 16, 2018 hearing before the court, the court granted the defendants’ leave to depose Hymes within 20 days of that hearing. No. 168. Oct. 16, 2018 Hr’g Tr. 34:22-36:21, ECF The defendants consented to this accommodation at the hearing and deposed Hymes on October 30, 2018. Dep, ECF No. 173-1. See id.; Hymes Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendants’ motion to strike and to exclude Hymes’ testimony is hereby denied. Finally, the defendants ask to file a corrected response to their August 31, 2018 response opposing the plaintiffs’ supplemental motion for class certification. Mot. Correct, ECF No. 161. Defs.’ The defendants identified “two 2 spelling errors, one missing word, one sentence fragment, and one instance where the phrase ‘class certification claim’ was inadvertently used instead of ‘health status discrimination claim’” in the original filing. Id. at 2. It is ORDERED that the defendants’ motion be, and hereby is, granted. The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this order to all counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: September 30, 2019 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?