Rose v. Colvin

Filing 20

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 19 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; the plaintiff's 10 request for judgment on the pleadings is granted to the extent that it requests remand of the Commissioner' s decision; the Commissioner's 17 request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner is denied; the Commissioner's final decision is reversed; this action is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Proposed Findings and Recommendation; and dismissed from the docket. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/19/2017. (cc: counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON BRANDI CHARLES ROSE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-12369 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was previously referred to Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, who has submitted her Proposed Findings and Recommendation pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation entered by the magistrate judge on September 18, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that the court “grant Plaintiff’s request for judgment on the pleadings, to the extent that it requests remand of the Commissioner’s decision; deny Defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner; reverse the final decision of the Commissioner; remand this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with [the Proposed Findings and Recommendation]; and dismiss this action from the docket of the [court].” (ECF #19 at 27 (emphases and citations UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON omitted).) THOMAS PARKER, The Commissioner has not objected to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-14025 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PROGRAM, an Employee Welfare Benefits Plan, Recommendations be, and hereby 1. The Proposed Findings and LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, a Massachusetts Corporation, and is, adopted by the court; DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive, 2. The plaintiff’s request for judgment on the pleadings be, Defendants. and hereby is, granted, to the extent that it requests ORDER AND NOTICE remand of the Commissioner’s decision; Pursuant to L.R. Civ. P. 16.1, it is ORDERED that the following dates are hereby fixed as the time by the on which of the 3. The Commissioner’s request to affirm or decision certain events must occur: 01/28/2016 Commissionerunder and hereby P. 12(b), together with Motions be, F.R. Civ. is, denied; supporting briefs, memoranda, affidavits, or other 4. The such matter in support thereof. (All motions is, Commissioner’s final decision be, and hereby unsupported by memoranda will be denied without reversed; prejudice pursuant to L.R. Civ. P. 7.1 (a)). 02/08/2016 ThisLast day be, and hereby is, remanded pursuant to 5. action for Rule 26(f) meeting. 02/15/2016 sentence day to file U.S.C. §of Parties= Planning Last four of 42 Report 405(g) for further Meeting. See L.R. Civ. P. 16.1. administrative proceedings consistent with the Proposed 02/22/2016 Scheduling conference at 4:30 p.m. at the Robert C. Byrd and Recommendation; and Findings United States Courthouse in Charleston, before the undersigned, unless canceled. Lead counsel 6. Thisdirected be, appear. action to and hereby is, dismissed from the docket. 02/29/2016 03/08/2016 Entry of scheduling order. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Last day to serve F.R. Civ. P 26(a)(1) disclosures. written opinion and order to all counsel of record and the The Clerk is requested to transmit this Order and United States Magistrate Judge. Notice to all counsel of record and to any unrepresented parties. ENTER: January 19, 2017 DATED: December 5, 2016 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?