Rodger II of the family of Atwood v. Connor et al

Filing 26

ORDER adopting and incorporating the 24 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; denying petitioner's 1 Petition for Equitable Relief; the petitioner is cautioned that he may be subject to sanctions should he continue to file clearly frivolous actions. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/23/2017. (cc: petitioner; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION RODGER II OF THE FAMILY OF ATWOOD, Petitioner, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-01180 CHRISTOPHER C. CONNOR, et al., Respondents. ORDER Pending before the court is the petitioner’s Petition for Equitable Relief [ECF No. 1]. This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On May 4, 2017, the Magistrate Judge submitted his Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [ECF No. 24] regarding the pending Petition. The petitioner timely filed his objections styled as “Plea in Abatement” [ECF No. 25]. The defendants did not timely file objections. Having reviewed the petitioner’s ten objections de novo, the court FINDS that all are without merit. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS and INCORPORATES herein the Magistrate Judge’s report in full. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that the petitioner’s Petition for Equitable Relief [ECF No. 1] is DENIED. Further, the petitioner is cautioned that he may be subject to sanctions should he continue to file clearly frivolous actions. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: 2 May 23, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?