Tulk v. Marshall University et al
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 16 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; directing that the complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/14/2020. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff, United States Magistrate Judge) (lca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON
SHERRY A. TULK,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-3079
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY, JEROME
GILBERT, WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY,
WEST VIRGINIA REED COLLEGE OF MEDIA,
CHAD MEZERA, GORDON GEE, WEST VIRGINIA
STATE UNIVERSITY REED COLLEGE OF MEDIA,
MARSHALL COLLEGE OF ARTS & MEDIA,
and SANRDA REED,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The court having received the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L.
Tinsley, entered on January 14, 2020; and the magistrate judge
having recommended that the court dismiss this civil action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted and for seeking monetary
relief from defendants who are immune from such relief; and no
objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the findings made in the
Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be,
and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated
herein.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the complaint be, and
it hereby is, dismissed.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this
memorandum opinion and order to plaintiff, all counsel of
record, and the United States Magistrate Judge.
DATED: February 14, 2020
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?