Tulk v. Marshall University et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 16 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; directing that the complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/14/2020. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff, United States Magistrate Judge) (lca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON SHERRY A. TULK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-3079 MARSHALL UNIVERSITY, JEROME GILBERT, WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY, WEST VIRGINIA REED COLLEGE OF MEDIA, CHAD MEZERA, GORDON GEE, WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY REED COLLEGE OF MEDIA, MARSHALL COLLEGE OF ARTS & MEDIA, and SANRDA REED, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley, entered on January 14, 2020; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court dismiss this civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for seeking monetary relief from defendants who are immune from such relief; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the findings made in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the complaint be, and it hereby is, dismissed. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this memorandum opinion and order to plaintiff, all counsel of record, and the United States Magistrate Judge. DATED: February 14, 2020 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?