Smith v. South Central Regional Jail
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 11 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; directing that the complaints are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 10/5/2018. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON
TERRY W. SMITH,
Plaintiff,
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
v.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
2:18-cv-00367
2:18-cv-00399
2:18-cv-00438
2:18-cv-00460
2:18-cv-00512
2:18-cv-00546
2:18-cv-00547
2:18-cv-00562
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The court having received the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L.
Tinsley, entered August 10, 2018; and the magistrate judge
having recommended that the court dismiss each of the abovestyled civil actions for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule
41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and no objection
having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation,
it is ORDERED that the findings made in the Proposed Findings
and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby
are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the movant’s complaints
be, and they hereby are, dismissed without prejudice.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this
written opinion and order to the pro se plaintiff, all counsel
of record, and the United States Magistrate Judge.
Dated: October 5, 2018
John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?