Smith v. South Central Regional Jail

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; directing that the complaints are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 10/5/2018. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON TERRY W. SMITH, Plaintiff, Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case v. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. 2:18-cv-00367 2:18-cv-00399 2:18-cv-00438 2:18-cv-00460 2:18-cv-00512 2:18-cv-00546 2:18-cv-00547 2:18-cv-00562 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley, entered August 10, 2018; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court dismiss each of the abovestyled civil actions for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the findings made in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the movant’s complaints be, and they hereby are, dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to the pro se plaintiff, all counsel of record, and the United States Magistrate Judge. Dated: October 5, 2018 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?