Greene v. Hart et al
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; directing that this civil action is dismissed; further directing that the 14 Motion to Amend filed by Michael Jermaine Greene and the 1 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs are denied as moot. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 5/10/2019. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party; Magistrate Judge; plaintiff) (lca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON
MICHAEL J. GREENE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-00905
ABBIE HART, KRISTINA BUTLER,
ELIZABETH BAILES, AMANDA JONES,
KELLY FOSTER, ALLISON MILLER,
PAM GIVENS, and SARAH COOPER,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The court having received the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L.
Tinsley, entered on April 3, 2019; and the magistrate judge
having recommended that the court dismiss this civil action
without prejudice and deny as moot plaintiff’s application to
proceed without prepayment of fees and costs and his motion to
amend the complaint; and no objection having been filed to the
Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the
findings and recommendation made in the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are,
adopted by the court and incorporated herein.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that this civil action be,
and it hereby is, dismissed without prejudice.
It is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s application to proceed without
prepayment of fees and costs and his motion to amend the
complaint be, and they hereby are, denied as moot.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this
written opinion and order to the plaintiff, all counsel of
record, and the United States Magistrate Judge.
ENTER: May 10, 2019
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?