Smith v. State of West Virginia et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting and incorporating the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The court dismisses this civil action and denies the 1 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/14/2019. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party, Magistrate Judge) (lca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION GARY A. SMITH Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00916 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants. ORDER This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On May 20, 2019, Magistrate Judge Tinsley submitted his Proposed Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] (“PF&R”), recommending the court dismiss this civil action pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A and deny the plaintiff’s Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs [ECF No. 1]. The deadline to file objections to the PF&R has passed, and, to date, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS and INCORPORATES herein the PF&R. For the reasons stated, the court DISMISSES this civil action pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A and DENIES the plaintiff’s Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs [ECF No. 1]. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record, any unrepresented party, and the Magistrate Judge. ENTER: 2 June 14, 2019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?