Sammons v. Saul

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting and incorporating the 16 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting 13 Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, to the extent that it requests remand; denying 14 Defendant's request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner; dismissing this action from the court's docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/30/2020. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION MICHAEL RAY SAMMONS Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-00319 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 31, 2020, Magistrate Judge Eifert submitted the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation (“PF&R”), [ECF No. 16], recommending the court grant Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, to the extent that it requests remand, [ECF No. 13]; deny Defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner, [ECF No. 14]; and dismiss this action from the docket. To date, no objections to Magistrate Judge Eifert’s PF&R have been filed, and the time period for the filing of objections has passed. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS and INCORPORATES herein the PF&R. For the reasons stated, the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, to the extent that it requests remand, [ECF No. 13]; DENIES Defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner, [ECF No. 14]; and DISMISSES this action from the court’s docket. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: April 30, 2020

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?