Randolph v. South Central Regional Jail et al
Filing
9
ORDER adopting the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Directing that South Central Regional Jail is dismissed from this matter. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 11/17/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties, United States Magistrate Judge) (lca)
Case 2:20-cv-00282 Document 9 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31
NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON
KEREEM RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-00282
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL, and
OFFICER MR. JOHNSON,
Defendants.
ORDER
This action was previously referred to United States
Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for submission to the court of
his Proposed Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) for
disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
On September
15, 2020, the magistrate judge entered his PF&R recommending
dismissal of South Central Regional Jail as a defendant,
pursuant to the court’s screening role under 28 U.S.C. §§
1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A.
ECF No. 5.
any objection to the PF&R.
Plaintiff has not filed
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (party has
fourteen days from service of PF&R to file objections); see also
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (providing an additional three days where
service is made by mail).
Case 2:20-cv-00282 Document 9 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 32
Plaintiff having not filed any objection to the PF&R,
it is ORDERED that the findings made in the PF&R of the
magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court
and incorporated herein.
It is further ORDERED that South
Central Regional Jail be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this order
to all counsel of record, to any unrepresented parties, and to
the United States Magistrate Judge.
ENTER: November 17, 2020
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?