Randolph v. South Central Regional Jail et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Directing that South Central Regional Jail is dismissed from this matter. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 11/17/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties, United States Magistrate Judge) (lca)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00282 Document 9 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31 NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON KEREEM RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-00282 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL, and OFFICER MR. JOHNSON, Defendants. ORDER This action was previously referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for submission to the court of his Proposed Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On September 15, 2020, the magistrate judge entered his PF&R recommending dismissal of South Central Regional Jail as a defendant, pursuant to the court’s screening role under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. ECF No. 5. any objection to the PF&R. Plaintiff has not filed See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (party has fourteen days from service of PF&R to file objections); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (providing an additional three days where service is made by mail). Case 2:20-cv-00282 Document 9 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 32 Plaintiff having not filed any objection to the PF&R, it is ORDERED that the findings made in the PF&R of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein. It is further ORDERED that South Central Regional Jail be, and it hereby is, dismissed. The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this order to all counsel of record, to any unrepresented parties, and to the United States Magistrate Judge. ENTER: November 17, 2020 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?