Wright v. Marshall et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; directing that the Plaintiff's 2 Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 1/27/2025. (cc: Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION EDWARD WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00490 WILLIAM K. MARSHALL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On September 9, 2024, the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint (Document 2) in this matter. By Administrative Order (Document 3) entered on September 10, 2024, this action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 3, 2025, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 7) wherein it is recommended that this Court dismiss the Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice and remove this matter from the Court’s docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by January 21, 2025. Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or 1 recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party’s right to appeal this Court’s Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff’s Complaint (Document 2) be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and this matter be REMOVED from the Court’s docket. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party. ENTER: 2 January 27, 2025

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?