Freeman v. Astrue
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 7 MOTION to Remand To Commissioner of Social Security; Grants Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Affirms the decision of the Commissioner, and Dismisses this action from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 5/13/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON DIVISION
CONNIE FRANCES FREEMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-0357
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert., United States Magistrate Judge,
for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and
recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be denied, Defendant’s Motion
for Judgment on the Pleadings be granted, the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed, and this
action be dismissed from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the
Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES the Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings,
GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, AFFIRMS the decision of the
Commissioner, and DISMISSES this action from the docket of the Court, consistent with the
findings and recommendation.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all
counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.
ENTER:
May 13, 2011
ROBERT C. CHAMBERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?