Ward v. Plymale et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court accepts and incorporates herein the 17 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and Denies Plaintiff's 5 motion for injunction, 11 motion for review of state court denial of mandamus relief, and 15 motion for an MRI of his leg consistant with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/17/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION MARK DELANE WARD, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-6186 LAUREN PLYMALE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for injunction, motion for review of state court denial of mandamus relief, and motion for an MRI of his leg (ECF Nos. 5, 11, 15). Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for injunction, motion for review of state court denial of mandamus relief, and motion for an MRI of his leg (ECF Nos. 5, 11, 15), consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: July 17, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?