Copley v. Colvin

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 9 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; granting Defendant's 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's 1 Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Dismissing the complaint, with prejudice, and removing this action from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/2/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION KEVIN COPLEY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-3362 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (ECF No. 7), dismiss the complaint, with prejudice, and remove this action from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (ECF No. 7), DISMISSES the complaint, with prejudice, and REMOVES this action from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: 2 April 2, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?