Nye v. Colvin

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court Accepts and Incorporates herein the 18 proposed findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and Denies Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Grants Defendant's 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Dismisses this action, with prejudice, from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/26/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION HEATHER NOEL NYE, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-12115 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff=s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 14), grant Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 17), and dismiss this action, with prejudice, from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES Plaintiff=s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 14), GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 17), and DISMISSES this action, with prejudice, from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendation. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: 2 June 26, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?