Thornhill v. Colvin

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court accepts and incorporates herein the 18 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and the Court Grants Defendant's 17 Motion to Remand Case; Vacates the decision of the Commissioner, and Remands Plaintiff's case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/8/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION GOLDIE ANN THORNHILL, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-23623 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court grant Defendant’s Uncontested Motion to Remand (ECF No. 17), reverse or vacate the decision of the Commissioner, and remand Plaintiff’s case to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings as outlined in the unopposed Motion. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and Court GRANTS Defendant’s Uncontested Motion to Remand (ECF No. 17), VACATES the decision of the Commissioner, and REMANDS Plaintiff’s case to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings as outlined in the unopposed Motion, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: 2 August 8, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?