Thornhill v. Colvin
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court accepts and incorporates herein the 18 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and the Court Grants Defendant's 17 Motion to Remand Case; Vacates the decision of the Commissioner, and Remands Plaintiff's case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/8/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
GOLDIE ANN THORNHILL,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-23623
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of the
Social Security Administration,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States
Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations
for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted
findings of fact and recommended that the Court grant Defendant’s Uncontested Motion to
Remand (ECF No. 17), reverse or vacate the decision of the Commissioner, and remand
Plaintiff’s case to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for
further proceedings as outlined in the unopposed Motion. Neither party has filed objections to
the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge and Court GRANTS Defendant’s Uncontested Motion to Remand (ECF
No. 17), VACATES the decision of the Commissioner, and REMANDS Plaintiff’s case to the
Commissioner pursuant to the fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings as
outlined in the unopposed Motion, consistent with the findings and recommendations.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all
counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.
August 8, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?