Rockwell v. United States of America
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Ricky Ray Rockwell; accepting and incorporating Magistrate Judge Eifert's 110 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; denying 99 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255); dismissing and removing this civil action from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/15/2016. (cc: Judge, USA, counsel, movant) (mkw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON DIVISION
RICKY RAY ROCKWELL
Movant,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-22817
CRIMINAL NO. 3:12-00180
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge,
for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and
recommended that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2255 (ECF No. 99) be denied, and that this civil action be dismissed and removed from the docket
of the Court.
Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and
recommendations.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 99) be denied, and that this civil action be dismissed and
removed from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all
counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.
ENTER:
September 15, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?