Hedrick v. Colvin

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; denying Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; affirming the 12 decision of the Commissioner; dismissing this action, with prejudice, and removing it from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/21/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION JOHN E. HEDRICK, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-23775 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF NO. 11), affirm the decision of the Commissioner (ECF NO. 12), dismiss this action, with prejudice, and remove it from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF NO. 11), AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner (ECF NO. 12), DISMISSES this action, with prejudice, and removes it from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: -2- August 21, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?