Adkins v. Colvin

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 13 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and denying Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, granting Defendant's 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Affirming the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismissing this matter from the Court's docket, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/4/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION RANDALL ADKINS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-27920 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 10), grant Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 11), affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this matter from the Court’s docket. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 10), GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 11), AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISSES this matter from the Court’s docket, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: -2- March 4, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?