Cruse v. Talbot et al

Filing 37

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 34 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; denying without prejudice the 24 MOTION by John Miller, John Talbot to Dismiss for Insufficiency and Service of Process and QUASHING the service of the summonses which were improperly served on John Talbot and Josh Miller, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/18/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION WENDELL CRUSE, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-3872 JOHN TALBOT, Cabell County Deputy Sheriff, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court deny, without prejudice, the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Insufficiency and Service of Process (ECF No. 24) and quash the service of the summonses which were improperly served on John Talbot and John Miller. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES, without prejudice, the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Insufficiency and Service of Process (ECF No. 24) and QUASHES the service of the summonses which were improperly served on John Talbot and John Miller, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: -2- March 18, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?