Holbrook v. WVRJA et al

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 29 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; granting Defendant Trinity Services Group, Inc's 11 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing the complaint against Trinity , without prejudice; granting Defendant West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority's 25 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing the complaint against the Jail Authority, with prejudice; and removing this matter from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/4/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION SHANE STEPHEN HOLBROOK, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 3:16-cv-03705 WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL & CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY;1 and TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC.2 Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court grant Trinity’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11); dismiss the complaint against Trinity, without prejudice; grant the Jail Authority’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25); dismiss the complaint against the Jail Authority, with prejudice, and remove this matter from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. 1 Identified in Holbrook’s complaint as West Virginia Regional Jail Authority or WVRJA. (ECF No. 2.) Identified in Holbrook’s complaint as Trinity Food Service. (ECF No. 2.) Trinity noted in its Motion to Dismiss that it is properly identified as Trinity Services Group, Inc. (ECF No. 11.) 2 1 Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and GRANTS Trinity’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11); DISMISSES the complaint against Trinity, without prejudice; GRANTS the Jail Authority’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25); DISMISSES the complaint against the Jail Authority, with prejudice, and REMOVES this matter from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: January 4, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?