United States of America ex rel. et al v. Farrell et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 16 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; directing that the United States' 11 Motion to Dismiss 2 Petition for Qui Tam False Claims Action be granted and that this civil action be dismissed, with prejudice, and removed from the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/28/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION UNITED STATES, ex rel. EDWARD JESS DREYFUSE, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-5273 PAUL T. FARRELL, JOHN “JACK” LAISHLEY, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the United States’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) be granted and that this civil action be dismissed, with prejudice, and removed from the docket of this Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that the United States’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) be GRANTED and that this civil action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, and REMOVED from the docket of this Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: March 28, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?