Spradlin v. West Virginia Regional Jail Authority
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; granting the West Virginia Regional Jail Authority's 9 Motion to Dismiss; denying Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Not Dismiss; dismissing the 2 Complaint against the Jail Authority, with prejudice; and removing this matter from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/6/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON DIVISION
JACOB SPRADLIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-8968
WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL
JAIL AUTHORITY,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge,
for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and
recommended that the Court grant the Jail Authority’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9); deny
Spradlin’s Motion to Not Dismiss (ECF No. 13); dismiss the complaint against the Jail Authority,
with prejudice, and remove this matter from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed
objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge and GRANTS the Jail Authority’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9);
DENIES Spradlin’s Motion to Not Dismiss (ECF No. 13); DISMISSES the complaint against the
Jail Authority, with prejudice, and REMOVES this matter from the docket of the Court,
consistent with the findings and recommendations.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all
counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.
ENTER:
-2-
June 6, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?