United States of America et al v. O'Hanlan et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 14 findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge; denying 4 MOTION by Wealthy Eanes to Compel; granting 10 MOTION by United States of America to Dismiss; DISMISSING this civil action, with prejudice, and REMOVING from the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/29/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION UNITED STATES, ex rel. WEALTHY EANES, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-10563 DAN O’HANLAN,1 JOHN “JACK” LAISHLEY, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that Relator’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 4) be denied; the United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) be granted; and that this civil action be dismissed, with prejudice, and removed from the docket of this Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that Relator’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 4) be DENIED; the United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) be GRANTED; and that this civil 1 The correct spelling is Dan O’Hanlon. action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, and REMOVED from the docket of this Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: -2- March 29, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?