Crumby v. United States of America
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; granting Petitioner's 15 Motion to Close Petition; dismissing Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2241; and removing this matter from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/8/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
DAVID LEE CRUMBY,
Case No. 3:17-cv-3897
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate
Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for
disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of
fact and recommended that the Court grant Petitioner’s Motion to Close Petition (ECF No. 15),
dismiss Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1), and remove this matter from the Court’s docket. Neither party has
filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge and GRANTS Petitioner’s Motion to Close Petition (ECF No. 15),
DISMISSES Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1), and REMOVES this matter from the Court’s docket,
consistent with the findings and recommendations.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all
counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.
March 8, 2018
ROBERT C. CHAMBERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?