Hall v. United States of America

Filing 128

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Daniel Lee Hall; directing that the findings made in the 125 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein and that Movant Danie l Lee Hall, Sr.'s 113 Motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, be, and it hereby is, denied; further directing that the movant's complaint be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 1/7/2019. (cc: Judge, movant, counsel of record, United States Magistrate Judge) (jsa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DANIEL LEE HALL, SR., Movant, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-03970 Criminal Action No. 3:09-cr-00187 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley, entered on May 29, 2018; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court deny movant Daniel Lee Hall, Sr.’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismiss this civil action from the docket of the court; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the findings made in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein and that Movant Daniel Lee Hall, Sr.’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, be, and it hereby is, denied. 1 It is, therefore, ORDERED that the movant’s complaint be, and it hereby is, dismissed. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to the movant, all counsel of record, and the United States Magistrate Judge. ENTER: January 7, 2019 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?