Hall v. United States of America
Filing
128
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Daniel Lee Hall; directing that the findings made in the 125 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein and that Movant Danie l Lee Hall, Sr.'s 113 Motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, be, and it hereby is, denied; further directing that the movant's complaint be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 1/7/2019. (cc: Judge, movant, counsel of record, United States Magistrate Judge) (jsa)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON
DANIEL LEE HALL, SR.,
Movant,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-03970
Criminal Action No. 3:09-cr-00187
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The court having received the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley,
entered on May 29, 2018; and the magistrate judge having recommended
that the court deny movant Daniel Lee Hall, Sr.’s motion to vacate,
set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and
dismiss this civil action from the docket of the court; and no
objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the findings made in the Proposed
Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they
hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein and that
Movant Daniel Lee Hall, Sr.’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct
sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, be, and it hereby is, denied.
1
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the movant’s complaint be,
and it hereby is, dismissed.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written
opinion and order to the movant, all counsel of record, and the United
States Magistrate Judge.
ENTER: January 7, 2019
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?