Grubb v. Morrison et al
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; directing that Plaintiff's 2 Complaint be dismissed, with prejudice; that the 1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs be denied as moot; and this civil action be removed from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/24/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON DIVISION
JAMES LLOYD GRUBB,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-0396
L.T. MORRISON;
C.O. SGT. PRINGLE;
C.O. TRANSPORTATION JARVIS,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge,
for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and
recommended that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 2) be dismissed, with prejudice; that the
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs be denied, as moot (ECF No. 1);
and this civil action be removed from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to
the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 2) be DISMISSED,
with prejudice; that the Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs be
DENIED, as moot (ECF No. 1); and this civil action be REMOVED from the docket of the Court,
consistent with the findings and recommendations.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all
counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.
ENTER:
August 24, 2018
ROBERT C. CHAMBERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?