Ross v. Rakes

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; directing that Plaintiff's 1 Complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Plaintiff's p ending 13 Motions be denied as moot; Defendant's 10 counterclaims be dismissed for failure to state a claim; and this action be removed from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/26/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION EMANUEL ROSS individually and on behalf of DR, minor child, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-0537 DANIELLE RAKES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Plaintiff’s pending motions be denied, as moot; Defendant’s counterclaims be dismissed for failure to state a claim, and this action be removed from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Plaintiff’s pending motions be DENIED, as moot; Defendant’s counterclaims be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim, and this action be REMOVED from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: November 26, 2018 ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?