McKinney v. United States of America
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Tinsley; dismissing the petitioner's 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and this civil action for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/18/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON DIVISION
KEITH CORNELL MCKINNEY,
Petitioner,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-0563
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate
Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for
disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of
fact and recommended that the Court dismiss the petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) and this civil action for lack of jurisdiction. Neither party has
filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge and DISMISSES the petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) and this civil action for lack of jurisdiction, consistent with
the findings and recommendations.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all
counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.
ENTER:
July 18, 2019
ROBERT C. CHAMBERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?