Dean v. Saul
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 20 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; denying the Claimant's 17 request for reversal or remand; granting the defendant's 19 request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner; affirming the final decision of the Commissioner; and dismissing this matter from this Court's docket. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/4/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
PAUL J. DEAN,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-0566
ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner
of the Social Security Administration,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate
Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for
disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of
fact and recommended that the Court deny the Claimant’s request for reversal or remand (ECF No.
17), grant the defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner (ECF No. 19), affirm
the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this matter from this Court’s docket. No
objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation have been filed.
Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendations
of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES the Claimant’s request for reversal or remand (ECF No. 17),
GRANTS the defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner (ECF No. 19),
AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISSES this matter from this Court’s
docket, consistent with the findings and recommendation.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any
June 4, 2021
ROBERT C. CHAMBERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?