Tripplett v. Young
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, DENYING Plaintiff's 4 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, DISMISSING Plaintiff's 1 Complaint/Motion and REMOVING this matter from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 7/9/2019. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party; Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn) (btm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
BECKLEY DIVISION
THOMAS D. TRIPPLET,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00316
D. L. YOUNG, Warden, FCI Beckley,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
On April 25, 2019, the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint/Motion (Document
1) in this matter. Subsequently, on May 10, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed
Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 4).
By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on April 25, 2019, the matter was referred to the
Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of
proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On June 11, 2019, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and
Recommendation (Document 5) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff’s
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 4), dismiss the
Plaintiff’s Complaint/Motion (Document 1), and remove this matter from the Court’s docket.
Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by June
28, 2019, and none were filed by either party.
1
The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or
legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation
to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file
timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party’s right to appeal this Court’s
Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989);
United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed Without Prepayment
of Fees and Costs (Document 4) be DENIED, the Plaintiff’s Complaint/Motion (Document 1) be
DISMISSED, and this matter be REMOVED from the Court’s docket.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge
Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.
ENTER:
2
July 9, 2019
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?