Jeffrey v. Moody
ORDER adopting Judge Eifert's 14 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION as to all issues; the 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/18/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
DAVID DALE JEFFREY,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13-cv-22196
DETECTIVE D. A. MOODY, et al.,
Now before the court are the plaintiff’s pro se Complaint [Docket 2] and Application to
Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs [Docket 1]. On February 13, 2014, Magistrate
Judge Eifert recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted. (See Proposed Findings & Recommendations (“PF&R”)
[Docket 14], at 1, 11). No objects to the PF&R were filed; therefore, I must only determine that
there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Diamond v. Colonial Life
& Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005). Having reviewed the record, I FIND no
clear error and hereby ADOPT Judge Eifert’s PF&R as to all issues. The Complaint is hereby
DISMISSED without prejudice.
The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any
June 18, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?