DeKeyser et al v Thyssenkrupp Waupaca Inc

Filing 471

ORDER REGARDING UNSEALING OF THE RECORD, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 11/26/2012. The Court VACATES that portion of 464 which required the unsealing of medical records of individual employees and any other individuals that were subm itted as part of the evidence in this case. The court finds good cause based on the privacy concerns of the individuals affected. The time within which to comply with the Courts order directing the parties to advise the clerk as to the specific portions of the record that is to remain under seal is extended to December 15, 2012. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RYAN DEKEYSER, et al., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 08-C-488 THYSSENKRUPP WAUPACA INC., Defendant. ORDER REGARDING UNSEALING RECORD The Court previously ordered that certain sections of the record in this matter be unsealed. Based upon the hearing held on November 21, 2012, the Court hereby VACATES its previous order concerning unsealing to the extent that it required the unsealing of medical records of individual employees and any other individuals that were submitted as part of the evidence in this case. The court finds good cause based on the privacy concerns of the individuals affected, as indicated by counsel for the plaintiffs. Since the medical records will remain under seal, the parties need not redact them to remove information such as birth dates. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(d). In addition, the time within which to comply with the court’s order directing the parties to advise the clerk as to the specific portions of the record that is to remain under seal in light of the court’s previous rulings is extended to December 15, 2012. SO ORDERED this 26th day of November, 2012. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?