Beeman v. OK Credit Reporting Service Inc

Filing 14

ORDER granting 13 Motion to Compel, signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 12/29/2010. Defendant is directed to produce its Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures to the plaintiff on or before January 10, 2011. Further, pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(A), defendant shall pay plaintiff's reasonable expenses incurred in making this motion, including attorney's fees. See Order for full detail. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
Beeman v. OK Credit Reporting Service Inc Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RACHEL BEEMAN, Plaintiff, v. OK CREDIT REPORTING SERVICE, INC., Defendants. Case No. 10-C-0624 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL On November 18, 2010, plaintiff Rachel Beeman filed a motion to compel defendant's Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures. Pursuant to this Court's Scheduling Order the parties' Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures were to be filed by October 15, 2010. (Dkt. 12.) Defendant did not file its disclosures by that date. Between October 20, 2010 and November 15, 2010 plaintiff attempted to communicate with defendant via letter, voice-mail, and email in order to obtain defendant's disclosures. Despite these efforts defendant has not filed its Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures, nor has it responded to plaintiff's motion to compel. More than twenty-one days have elapsed since the filing of the motion and no response has been filed. Accordingly, the motion to compel is GRANTED. Defendant is directed to produce its Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures to the plaintiff on or before January 10, 2011. Further, pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(A), defendant shall pay plaintiff's reasonable expenses incurred in making this motion, including attorney's fees. Dated this 29th day of December, 2010. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?