V v. Kratz

Filing 11

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C Griesbach: Scheduling Conference held on 3/9/2011. Initial disclosures due on or before May 1, 2011, Response to Motion to Intervene due on or before 03/21/11, Motion to dismiss due on or before 4/11/2011.

V v. Kratz

Doc. 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

S.V., Plaintiff, v. KENNETH KRATZ, Defendant, and STATE OF WISCONSIN, Proposed Intervenor. RULE 16 TELEPHONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Case No. 10-C-919

HONORABLE WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, presiding Deputy Clerk: Cheryl Proceeding Held: March 9, 2011 Appearances: Plaintiff(s): Michael R. Fox

Tape: Hearing Began: Hearing Ended:

9:05 a.m. 9:35 a.m.

Defendant(s): Robert E. Bellin, Jr. Proposed Intervenor:

Monica Brist

Scheduling: Initial Disclosures: May 1, 2011

The parties address the State of Wisconsin's motions to intervene and bifurcate. The plaintiff opposes the motion. The Court GRANTS the motion to intervene and defers ruling on the motion to bifurcate. (See final ruling in these minutes) The parties and Court discuss the sufficiency of the equal protection claim. Attorney Fox states there is sufficient case law to support the claim. Attorney Bellin does not believe there is a claim and suggests further discussion to resolve the matter. Attorney Brist suggests briefing on the matter and that it is premature to discuss resolution at this point. The Court inquires as to subject matter/supplemental jurisdiction over the State of Wisconsin/Kratz matter and how to most efficiently move this case forward.

Dockets.Justia.com

Parties suggest briefing on motion to intervene. The Court VACATES the order granting the motion to intervene and sets briefing schedule on the motion. Any response to the motion to intervene is due on or before March 21, 2011. Any motion to dismiss is due on or before April 11, 2011. The State may withdraw their motion to intervene without prejudice, but shall notify the parties of their intention.