Non Typical Inc et al v. Transglobal Logistics Group Inc. et al

Filing 48

ORDER FOR JUDGMENT - granting 46 Motion for Default Judgment. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Hanover Insurance Company and against Transglobal Logistics in the amount of $600,000. Upon default, judgment shall be entered in favor of Citizens Insurance Company of America against Transglobal in the amount of $150,000. Signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 07/25/2011. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN NON TYPICAL INC., Plaintiff, and HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Involuntary Plaintiff, v. Case No. 10-C-1058 TRANSGLOBAL LOGISTICS GROUP INC, and SCHNEIDER LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL INC., Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY and CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, as Subrogees of Non typical Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 11-C-156 TRANSGLOBAL LOGISTICS GROUP INC, and SCHNEIDER LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL INC., Defendants. ORDER FOR JUDGMENT This matter came before the Court on a motion for a default judgment by Citizens Insurance Company of American and Hanover Insurance Company, both subrogees to the loss that is the subject of this action. The defendant Transglobal Logistics Group, Inc., having failed to respond to their complaints and having defaulted, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered in favor of Hanover Insurance Company pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and against Transglobal Logistics in the amount of $600,000.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon default, Judgment shall be entered in favor of Citizens Insurance Company of America against Transglobal in the amount of $150,000.00. Dated this 25th day of July, 2011. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?