United States of America v. Approximately $59699 US Currency
Filing
19
JUDGMENT entered by Deputy Clerk in favor of United States of America against Robert Cadmus in the amount of $27,699.10; approved by Judge William C Griesbach on 05/04/2012. (cc: all counsel)(aw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
AT LAW AND IN ADMIRALTY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 11-C-919
v.
APPROXIMATELY $59,699.10 IN
UNITED STATES CURRENCY,
Defendant.
JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
This cause having come before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of
Forfeiture;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:
1. The United States shall release to the claimant, Robert E. Cadmus Jr., by and
through his attorney, Shane L. Brabazon, Brabazon Law Office, LLC, 221
Packerland Drive, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54303, the sum of $32,000.00 of the
approximately $59,699.10 defendant property, less any debt owed to the United
States or any agency of the United States, or any other debt that the United States
is authorized to collect.
2. All right, title, and interest in the remaining defendant property, approximately
$27,699.10 of the approximately $59,699.10 in United States currency, shall be,
and hereby is, forfeited to the United States of America.
3. The Internal Revenue Service shall deposit the approximately $27,699.10 in
United States currency into the United States Department of the Treasury
Forfeiture Fund for disposition according to law.
4. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this cause for the purpose of enforcing the
Judgment of Forfeiture.
Dated at Green Bay, Wisconsin, this 4th day of May, 2012.
APPROVED:
s/ William C. Griesbach
HONORABLE WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH
United States District Judge
Judgment entered this 4th day of May, 2012.
JON W. SANFILIPPO
Clerk of Court
By:
Mary Fisher
Deputy Clerk
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?