United States of America v. 2008 Haulmark Motorhome VIN #1FVHCRCK78DZ44088 et al
Filing
63
ORDER denying without prejudice 62 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 10/16/2012. Absent information as to the amount, if any, of the cash claimant holds, or the amounts in his various accounts, t he Court is unable to determine whether he is truly indigent or not. If claimant wishes the Court to reconsider, he should file an amended affidavit of indigency that fully answers the questions necessary for the Courts determination. (cc: all counsel by efile; Nikki Lee by U.S. Mail) (Griesbach, William)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 12-C-221
2008 HAULMARK MOTORHOME
VIN #1FVHCRCK78DZ44088, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT
PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR COSTS
Claimant in the above matter seeks to appeal the Court’s order denying his motion to
dismiss the action on grounds of res judicata or claim preclusion and also the decision to stay the
matter to allow an underlying criminal case to proceed. In his affidavit in support of his petition
to proceed in forma pauperis, claimant indicates that he does have cash or checking, savings and
other similar accounts. He does not state the total amount of such sums, instead leaving blank the
place where the answer is to be inserted. Absent information as to the amount, if any, of the cash
claimant holds, or the amounts in his various accounts, the Court is unable to determine whether
he is truly indigent or not. Under these circumstances, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis
is denied, but without prejudice. If claimant wishes the Court to reconsider, he should file an
amended affidavit of indigency that fully answers the questions necessary for the Court’s
determination.
SO ORDERED this
16th
day of October, 2012.
s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?