US Bank NA v. Long

Filing 31

ORDER re 30 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 07/08/2014. An amended judgment is not entered for an award of costs and fees post-judgment (see Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196, 202 (198 8); see also Exch. Natl Bank v. Daniels, 763 F.2d 286, 29394 (7th Cir. 1985)), therefore an amended judgment will not be entered. Rather, the fees and costs will be imposed by this order and Defendant shall pay the Banks reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $53,285.00 and costs in the amount of $8,513.85. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 13-C-0257 JEFFREY S. LONG, Defendant. ORDER On July 3, 2014, the Court granted a motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses brought by Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association (“the Bank”). (ECF No. 30.) In the order, the Court concluded that the Bank was entitled to attorneys’ fees of $53,285.00 and expenses of $8,513.85 pursuant to the “Continuing Guaranty (Unlimited)” given by Defendant Jeffrey S. Long and directed the Clerk to enter an amended judgment. However, an amended judgment is not entered for an award of costs and fees post-judgment. See Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196, 202 (1988); see also Exch. Nat’l Bank v. Daniels, 763 F.2d 286, 293–94 (7th Cir. 1985). As a result, an amended judgment will not be entered. Rather, the fees and costs will be imposed by this order. THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that Defendant pay the Bank’s reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $53,285.00 and costs in the amount of $8,513.85. Dated this 8th day of July, 2014. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?