Selenske v. Estate of Louise Selenske

Filing 27

ORDER DENYING 24 Request filed by Richard Selenske, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 11/14/2014. The Court construes the request as a Motion to Supplement the record pursuant to F.R.A.P. 10(e). Selenske has offered no reason why these materials are necessary to a fair resolution of his appeal. Accordingly, the motion is denied. (cc: all counsel via efile; Selenske via U.S. Mail)(Griesbach, William)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
RICHARD SELENSKE,
Appellant,
v.

Case No. 14-C-473

ESTATE OF LOUISE SELENSKE,
Appellee.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

The appellant in this Bankruptcy matter has filed a request to include attached documents
in the appeal record. I construe his request as a Motion to Supplement the record pursuant to
F.R.A.P. 10(e). That Rule allows the court to supplement the record upon a finding that anything
material to either party is omitted from or misstated in the record by error or accident. Selenske
makes no explanation as to why the additional documents should be made part of the appeal record.
The documents appear to relate to state court proceedings that took place after the bankruptcy
court’s order in this case was affirmed. None of them appear to bear on the issues raised, nor do
they indicate a need for reconsideration. Selenske has offered no reason why these materials are
necessary to a fair resolution of his appeal. Accordingly, the motion is denied.
SO ORDERED this 14th

day of November, 2014.

s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge
United States District Court