Sus et al v. Audi of America Incorporated et al

Filing 34

ORDER DENYING APPROVAL of 32 Stipulation for Protective Order filed by Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Volkswagen Group of America Inc, Audi Aktiengesellschaft, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 02/25/2015, as it would seem to be a violation of Leavell and the requirement that courts operate in public. See Union Oil Co. v. Leavell, 220 F3d 562 (7th Cir. 2000) and this Order for full detail. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DILLON J. SUS, Plaintiff, Case No. 14-C-742 and STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, UNITED HEALTHCARE OF WISCONSIN, INCORPORATED and GOLDEN RULE INSURANCE COMPANY, Involuntary Plaintiffs, v. AUDI OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, DEF INSURANCE COMPANY, AUDI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, Defendants. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER The parties have submitted a stipulation for a protective order in the above matter. The proposed Protective Order fails to take cognisance of the fact that no documents filed with the Court will be sealed absent a showing of good cause. The agreement of the parties to maintain documents under seal is not sufficient. See Union Oil Co. v. Leavell, 220 F3d 562 (7th Cir. 2000.) In addition, the proposed order contemplates the parties removing from the Court file documents that have been designated confidential after the termination of the litigation. This would also seem to be a violation of Leavell and the requirement that courts operate in public. Accordingly, the stipulated motion for a protective order is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ William C. Griesbach WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?