T&M Inventions LLC v. Acuity Brands Lighting Inc et al
Filing
77
ORDER inviting defendants' counsel to submit a supplemental response to plaintiff's argument that defendants expressly assumed liability for any inventorship claims in BRIEF filed by T&M Inventions LLC 74 , signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 08/31/2016. Such response is due on or before September 9, 2016 (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William C.)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
T&M INVENTIONS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 14-C-0947
ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
On August 25, 2016, the parties simultaneously submitted supplemental briefs addressing the
court’s question as to Acuity’s liability as a successor-in-interest to the ‘944 Patent. After reviewing
the supplemental briefing, the court invites Acuity to respond to T&M’s argument that Acuity
expressly assumed liability for any inventorship claims filed by Pendley and McLain. Acuity should
file its response on or before September 9, 2016.
SO ORDERED this 31st
day of August, 2016.
s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge
United States District Court
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
