Vele v. Wright, et al
Filing
21
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Transfer. This case is transferred to the Eastern District of Wisconsin pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/6/2016. (jef),(ps) [Transferred from wiwd on 4/7/2016.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DENNIS NEIL VELE,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
15-cv-151-wmc
SHERIFF RANDALL WRIGHT,
DEPUTY RANDALL GIESE, STEPHEN
P. BURROUGHS, WARDEN MICHAEL
MEISNER, HOLLY A. GUNDERSON,
LORI DOEHLING, BRIAN MILLER and
RICKY L. SEABUL,
Defendants.
State inmate Dennis Neil Vele filed a civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging
that defendants violated his constitutional rights in connection with the conditions of his
confinement in the Shawano County Jail and the Redgranite Correctional Institution. In
an order dated December 15, 2015, the court told Vele that his complaint violated Rule
20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because he had asserted multiple claims that
cannot be joined in one lawsuit. In particular, the court found that Vele’s claims could
be divided into the following three lawsuits:
Lawsuit #2: Claims Against Defendant Seabul Arising Out of Seabul’s
Treatment of Vele’s Elbow Injury.
1
Lawsuit #1: Claims Against Defendants Wright, Giese and Burroughs
Arising from Vele’s Injury at the Shawano County Jail.
Lawsuit #3: Claims against Defendants Meisner, Gunderson, Doehling,
and Miller Arising Out of Vele’s Transfer from a Single Cell and Loss of
Wheelchair.1
The court noted that Vele may also have intended to bring claims against defendants or others
Vele was instructed to identify which lawsuit he wished to pursue under this case
number and decide whether he wished to dismiss the other lawsuits at this time. He
responded first on January 14, 2016, stating that he wished to pursue Lawsuit #2. (Dkt.
#15.) On February 2, 2016, however, he filed a motion requesting an extension of time
in which to decide which claims to pursue, indicating that he intended to file a new
complaint. (Dkt. #17.) A few days later, on February 8, 2016, Vele filed a proposed
amended complaint, in which he alleged claims against various Shawano County Jail staff
for their alleged failure to accommodate his need for a wheelchair and the injury that
resulted when he fell under this possible Lawsuit #3 above, as well as allege additional
facts to support claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act.
(Dkt. #17.)
In addition, his proposed amended complaint appears to expand the
allegations of possible Lawsuit #1 above from his original complaint. Finally, he has also
filed two motions for appointment of counsel (dkt. ##18, 20), and a motion to transfer
this case to the Eastern District of Wisconsin under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, on the grounds
that venue is improper in this court (dkt. #19).
Because Vele’s proposed amended complaint focuses on his claims against
Shawano County Jail staff and events that occurred at the Shawano County Jail, he is
correct that venue is proper in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).
In contrast, there appears to be no connection between the allegations of Vele’s amended
complaint and this district. Accordingly, this court will grant Vele’s motion to transfer
for failing to treat his allegedly defective prosthetic leg or accommodate his need for assistance as
a result. However, he had not properly pleaded such claims, so the court did not include those
claims in the lawsuits identified above.
2
this case to the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
Because this court will no longer be
handling this case, the court will not address Vele’s proposed amended complaint or
motions for appointment of counsel, beyond what is summarized above. Those matters
will be taken up by the Eastern District.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Dennis Neil Vele’s motion to transfer (dkt. #19) is
GRANTED. This case is transferred to the Eastern District of Wisconsin pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1406.
Entered this 6th day of April, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?