Badgett v. Lunenberg et al

Filing 77

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' request that Plaintiff's witness, Walter DeJesus, testify by video conference, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 11/09/2018. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN CHRISTOPHER BADGETT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-C-49 MICHAEL LUENEBURG and JONATHAN STEELE, Defendants. ORDER Plaintiff Christopher Badgett filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants Michael Lueneburg and Jonathan Steele violated his constitutional rights. At the final pretrial conference held on November 9, 2018, Defendants requested that Walter DeJesus, one of plaintiff’s witnesses who is currently incarcerated at Waupun Correctional Institution, testify by video conference at the jury trial scheduled for November 26, 2018. The use of video conference technology is permissible as a matter of discretion. Allen v. Wine, 297 F. App’x 524, 533 (7th Cir. 2008). The Seventh Circuit has recognized that “a witness may testify via video ‘for good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards.’” Id. (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 43(a)); see also Stone v. Morris, 546 F.2d 730 (7th Cir. 1976). Plaintiff did not object to the Defendants’ request and noted that DeJesus is currently housed in segregation, suggesting concerns associated with security as well as the costs and inconvenience of DeJesus’ transportation. In addition, requiring Plaintiff’s witness to testify by video conference does not violate fundamental notions of fairness since no other non-party witnesses will testify in person, as it appears the only witnesses Defendants intend to call are the parties of this case. The court therefore concludes that good cause exists to permit DeJesus to testify by video conference. The clerk is directed to issue appropriate process for the video appearance of DeJesus. SO ORDERED this 9th day of November, 2018. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?