John P Fischer v. Social Security Administration
Filing
3
ORDER FOR RESPONSE re 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by John P Fischer, directing the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General to file a response on or before May 16, 2017, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 05/05/2017 . Community First Credit Unions obligation to respond to the subpoena is stayed pending resolution of the motion. (cc: John Fischer, Office of Inspector General of the SSA, U.S. Attorney, and Community First Credit Union via U.S. Mail)(Griesbach, William)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JOHN P. FISCHER,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 17-C-22
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL,
Defendant.
ORDER FOR RESPONSE
John P. Fischer has moved for an order preventing the government from obtaining access
to his financial records. The motion is in response to a subpoena issued by the Office of the
Inspector General of the Social Security Administration seeking records held at Community First
Credit Union by John P. Fischer and Christian Alliance Church. Fischer states in a sworn statement
that it would be redundant to produce these records because the Social Security Appleton office
already has access to his bank statements. Fischer also asserts that separation of church and state
preclude access to the records. In his view, the church account has nothing to do with his personal
savings account.
Community First Credit Union’s obligation to respond to the subpoena duces tecum in this
matter is stayed pending resolution of the motion to quash.
Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3410(b), the Court hereby directs the Social Security Administration
Office of Inspector General to file a sworn response to Fischer’s motion. The response should be
filed on or before May 16, 2017.
SO ORDERED this 5th
day of May, 2017.
s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?