Gage v. Zanon et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C. Griesbach on 9/27/18. The 29 MOTION to Stay is granted subject to the following exception: the parties may continue to undertake any discovery necessary to resolve the exhaustion of administrative remedies issued. In all other respects, however, discovery is stayed and the deadlines are vacated. Plaintiff's 26 MOTION to accept late submission and 25 MOTION to compel are denied as moot. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Shane Gage)(Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SHANE RYAN GAGE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-C-240 DR KRISTINE ZANON, Defendant. ORDER This is a § 1983 civil rights case brought by a prisoner currently serving a sentence in a Wisconsin prison against one of the correctional officers. The defendant has moved for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Defendant has also moved to stay discovery and the dispositive motion deadline that would otherwise apply until his motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust is decided. The motion for a stay is granted, subject to the following exception: The parties may continue to undertake any discovery necessary to resolve the exhaustion of administrative remedies issued. In all other respects, however, discovery is stayed and the deadlines are vacated. In the event the motion for summary judgment currently before the court is denied, the court will establish new deadlines. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and his motion to accept a late submission are denied as moot. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. [27], remains pending and awaits the plaintiff’s response. SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2018. s/ William C. Griesbach United States District Court William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?