Hoskins v. Waukesha County Jail Administration et al

Filing 21

ORDER No answer is required at this time until and unless Plaintiff is able to identify the correctional officer who allegedly injured him. In the event that the Jail Administrator or Wollenhaupt chooses to answer and interpose an affirmative defense at this time, before the identity of the actual defendant is determined, they are free to do so. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Michael Hoskins)(Griesbach, William)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

MICHAEL S. HOSKINS,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 18-C-413

ANGELA WOLLENHAUPT, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER

The original screening order determined that Plaintiff had stated a claim against an unknown
correctional officer. Although no claims were stated against them, the Jail Administrator and Angela
Wollenhaupt were kept in the case to facilitate identification of the unknown correctional officer.
See Donald v. Cook Cty. Sheiff’s Dep’t, 95 F.3d 548, 556 (7th Cir. 1996). No answer is required
at this time until and unless Plaintiff is able to identify the correctional officer who allegedly injured
him. In the event that the Jail Administrator or Wollenhaupt chooses to answer and interpose an
affirmative defense at this time, before the identity of the actual defendant is determined, they are
free to do so.
SO ORDERED this 14th day of June, 2018.
s/ William C. Griesbach
William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge
United States District Court