Harper v. Giese et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 12/10/18. Harper's 57 Motion to Amend complaint will be denied without prejudice. Harper may promptly renew his motion and attach a proposed amended complaint to his motion in compliance with the local rules. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Kevin Omar Harper) (Griesbach, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KEVIN OMAR HARPER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-C-753 ERIC STEFONEK, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the court on pro se Plaintiff Kevin Harper’s motion to amend the complaint. ECF No. 57. According to his motion, Harper seeks to add additional claims and defendants to his complaint. In order to amend the complaint, Harper needs to attach an amended complaint to his motion that includes all of the defendants as well as all of the claims Harper seeks to bring against those defendants and the facts upon which those claims are based. Harper’s motion fails to comply with the local rules of the district, which state that “[t]he proposed amended pleadings must be filed as an attachment to the motion to amend.” Civil L.R. 15(b) (E.D. Wis.). Harper did not attach his proposed amended complaint to his motion. Accordingly, Harper’s motion will be denied, but without prejudice. Harper may promptly renew his motion and attach a proposed amended complaint to his motion in compliance with the local rules. SO ORDERED this 10th day of December, 2018. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?