Bowers v. Smith
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/20/15 denying 64 Motion for Reconsideration. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner) (dm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
_____________________________________________________________________
WILLIAM B. BOWERS,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 02-cv-1034
JUDY P. SMITH, Warden,
Oshkosh Correctional Institution,
Respondent.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Pro se petitioner William Bowers filed a petition for federal habeas relief under 28
U.S.C. § 2254. I concluded that the only two claims for federal relief that petitioner had not
procedurally defaulted on in state court were his claim that he was deprived of his Fifth
Amendment right against self-incrimination and his ineffective assistance of trial counsel
claim for failure to challenge the prosecutor’s alleged breach of the plea agreement. I then
concluded that the state court’s decisions on these two issues were not contrary to or an
unreasonable application of clearly established federal law and denied the petition.
Petitioner now asks me to reconsider my decision.
Having reviewed plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, I see no basis for
reconsidering my initial decision. First, petitioner’s arguments in his reconsideration motion
are related to the merits of claims that I deemed were procedurally defaulted and thus
could not address on the merits. Second, I note that I may not review the merits of
petitioner’s claims de novo, rather I may only grant federal habeas relief if the state court
decision was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established
federal law. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Nothing in petitioner’s reconsideration motion leads me to
conclude that the state court decisions were unreasonable.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (ECF
No. 64) is DENIED.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 20th day of March, 2015.
s/ Lynn Adelman
_____________________
LYNN ADELMAN
District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?